dith0rder
11-09-2009, 01:18 PM
It seems it's become quite the controversial subject. People have been accused of "cheating" the system, some are annoyed that their decks are rated down with no explanation, and I personally find it annoying that 3 of the top rated decks are not actual decks.
First of all, I think it's very important to specify whether a deck is meant to be Casual or Tournament Quality (it should be a requirement when beginning to make the deck). This distinction will help those commenting/rating to know how to rate/comment it.
My suggestion is to require a comment when rating a deck. With this implemented, people will be more likely to make helpful suggestions and people will no longer wonder what's wrong with the deck. This will also make it a little harder for people to "cheat" the system.
On a slightly different note, I support hipponox's idea for decks in each category being rated among that category; great idea. Well, thanks for listening.
First of all, I think it's very important to specify whether a deck is meant to be Casual or Tournament Quality (it should be a requirement when beginning to make the deck). This distinction will help those commenting/rating to know how to rate/comment it.
My suggestion is to require a comment when rating a deck. With this implemented, people will be more likely to make helpful suggestions and people will no longer wonder what's wrong with the deck. This will also make it a little harder for people to "cheat" the system.
On a slightly different note, I support hipponox's idea for decks in each category being rated among that category; great idea. Well, thanks for listening.