|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ok I've started rolling out a few of the features I promised yesterday and I would appretiate any feedback you can give me, wether you spot a bug, want to tell us if the feature isn't quite right or even (hopefully) if it is.
The following features should now be live:
![]() Last edited by Ian; 02-22-2010 at 09:59 PM. Reason: Added Deck Search |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Before you ask:
![]() Last edited by Ian; 02-22-2010 at 09:58 PM. Reason: Done deck search! |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think this new setting is way better to find the cards u r looking for and the stats of the deck really help out good job and keep it comming.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Couple of things:
The deck stats by type, for creature counting it is not counting artifact creatures (counting them only as artifacts) this makes the count not very useful if you are running artifact creatures. The "rate this deck" input box doesnt have any information to say what should be put in it... is it out of 10? 100? 57? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Other than that though looking good! thanks for your hard work
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
how about doing a rotation of different types of top decks, say, every week or month or so? like burn one week, casual play the next, etc.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
True, I guess I never thought about it as I knew! If you enter an incorrect value it tells you "Only vote between 0.00 and 10.00" so it's out of 10, but because of the decimals I guess it's effectively out of 1,000! :PYeah, we have a few ideas on this, but we really need to see if the new data we're going to be collecting is going to work the way we want it to first and we also want to be 100% sure our voting problems will be solved before we go creating extra stuff for it. For now the ratings will simply be shown on a per deck basis, and will therefore probably be giving a much more accurate result as there's no need for people to play silly fools for no reward. :P |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
In my opinion yes, as what the stats are useful for is say checking that you have a decent creature-base, or checking how vulnerable you are to anti-artifact stuff or how much synergy with a particular card type your gona get, so I'd say them counting as both would be most useful, though it should probably be explained that this is the case somewhere.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Also, from a user interface point of view there is no feedback when you put in a rating if the deck has too few votes, the page just reloads, so I have no idea when I'm using it whether or not my vote has actually gone through.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Also, I think the icon on the delete deck button is pretty unclear, maybe make the waste basket bigger?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|